Skip to main content

Concepts and universal structure

Every political and philosophical theory is only as useful as the number of variables the theory takes into account. In some way, every political and philosophical theory can be said to have a certain amount of predictive power, a certain illuminating factor. Every school of thought can be seen as an attempt to define a boundary between that which is inside and that which is outside. Some political theories focus on the divide between the citizen and the state. Some philosophical theories focus on the divide between thought and matter. And this divide could be metaphorically interpreted as a grammar which allows causal associations: as a way to understand the changing relationship between the inside and the outside.

The growth of every theory requires experimentation. And experimentation requires that one side of the coin is held constant, either the inside or the outside. The boundary between the inside and outside is refined through experimentation. Somethings that were originally considered to belong outside were actually found to belong inside, and vice versa. In an abstract, all theories are just a crystallization of  information through an empirical process that discerns the inside from the outside. Though the initial divide could be seen as arbitrary, that which survives repeated experiments is not. Given enough experimentation, the center of the inside becomes an approximation of part of some universal structure, regardless of how the conceptual space is initially cut. 

Every theory attempts to capture the true universal structure. Yet it may be that every theory which discerns between an inside and an outside inherently and ultimately cripples itself, for it may be that the universal structure is not something that can be represented by a simple cut. It could be that the only theories that can approximate the true universal structure are theories that are self-aware of the conceptual cuts they are making. A kind of fractal structure. It could be that absoluteness is not in the contents of the inside or outside, but in the cuts themselves. There could be a mathematical structure to the cuts that reveal the true universal structure.

If the true universal structure cannot be captured by a simple conceptual cut, then no simple political or philosophical theory will ever have complete predictive power. And perhaps the only useful theory is that which is able to determine which cut is useful and which cut is not. And perhaps this is also the primary function of intelligence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Causality, Interaction, and Complexity

In a highly chaotic system, such as a high temperature gas, it is not ideal to use an atomic causal model. Instead, the effective causal model is to approximate to what extent each atom is interacting with every other atom. If we increase the temperature, then the number of atoms each atom interacts with should increase. As the temperature decreases, the number of atoms each atom interacts with should decrease. If we were to randomly sample any atom, then on average, the atom should interact with a set of atoms of a certain size. Instead of thinking in terms of conditional probabilities and causal implications, we think in terms of sets of interconnected events. And this is because it is not computationally effective to analyze chaotic systems in a linear manner. We can apply the same line of reasoning to sampling. If a system has a particular sampling rate, the inputs to the system are batched according to the sampling rate. In other words, the system cannot discern the ordering of ev

Emergent Replication and the Fractal Computer

Computation and Morality